Author: Noel Carr

  • Celebrity Chefs must know the difference to replace farmed salmon with a Wild fish

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-205547/Salmon-health-alert.html#ixzz3HeuWv8gu

    Salmon health alert

    09:49 31 Oct 2014, updated 11:35 09 Jan 2004

    Scientists Issued a devastating new warning last night about the safety of Scottish farmed salmon. They said the fish is so contaminated with toxic chemicals it should be eaten no more than three times a year. The chemicals, which have been linked to cancer and birth defects, come from the feed used in fish farms. The findings could have a shattering impact on the €700million-a-year Scottish salmon farming industry, which supports some 6,500 jobs. Sales of salmon soared as farming brought prices down and the health benefits of oily fish emerged. It has overtaken cod as the best-selling fresh fish in Britain – and 98 per cent comes from Scottish farms. Salmon farmers there branded the latest study “deliberately misleading” last night while the Food Standards Agency said the levels of pollutants were within safety limits used by Britain, the EU and the World Health Organisation. Its chairman Sir John Krebs said the health benefits of eating oily fish outweighed any risk. But Dr Jeffery Foran, an American toxicologist involved in the study, said neither he nor his family would eat farmed salmon again after what he discovered. Poullutants The project – based at the University of Albany in New York state – looked at pollutant levels in farmed and wild salmon bought in Britain, Europe and North America. Previous small-scale studies had identified a contamination risk, but this is by far the biggest and most comprehensive study. Researchers measured the levels of industrial pollutants – PCBs and dioxins – and agricultural pesticides such as toxaphene and dieldrin. They examined 700 fish, some bought in London supermarkets and some direct from Scottish farms. The highest concentrations were found in fish from Scotland and the Faroe Islands. Dr Foran said this may be because their feed contains oil recovered from the ground-up bodies of tiny sea life harvested in the North Atlantic – a dumping ground for decades for manmade toxins. Fish from Norway also performed badly. The study, published in the respected U.S. journal Science, concluded: “The consumption advice is that no more than one meal every four months should be consumed in order to avoid an increased risk of cancer.” Even smaller amounts, it suggested, could trigger harmful effects to brain function and the immune system. Dr Foran said: “All the compounds we were looking for are classified as probable carcinogens. The evidence from comprehensive animal studies points to a range of cancers including liver, breast, lymphatic and thyroid. “There are a variety of other health effects, particularly in relation to PCBs. “They include reproductive and developmental effects. There are also neurological, brain function effects and immune system effects.” All the fish tested was in fillets, but the findings apply equally to smoked salmon. Almost all tinned salmon, however, is produced from wild fish which have only low levels of pollution. “Benefits outweigh risks” Despite the startling results of the survey, the FSA said it was sticking by its advice to consumers. Sir John Krebs said: “People should consume at least two portions of fish a week – one of which should be oily like salmon. “There is good evidence that eating oily fish reduces the risk of death from heart attacks. We advise that the known benefits outweigh any possible risks.” Scottish Quality Salmon, which represents farmers, said the researchers had been wrong to use strict guidelines drawn up by the U.S. Environment Protection Agency rather than those used elsewhere in the world. Technical consultant Dr John Webster said: “PCB and dioxin levels in Scottish salmon are significantly lower than the thresholds set by international watchdogs”. The organisation said its members apply “the most stringent independently inspected quality assurance standards in the world”. It said feed suppliers had taken steps to minimise PCB and dioxin levels, including sourcing fish meal and oils from seas which are less polluted and switching to plant oils. But Don Staniford of the Salmon Farm Protest Group said: “This scientific study blows out of the water the myth that farmed salmon is safe, nutritious and healthy. “It’s official – salmon is now the most contaminated foodstuff on the supermarket shelf.” Dr Dan Barlow, head of research for Friends of the Earth, said: “We have long known that farmed salmon were more heavily contaminated with toxic pollutants than their wild relatives. “We now know Scottish-raised salmon are among the most contaminated and that the levels of contaminants may be so high as to possibly detract from the health benefits of eating fish.” Pollutants are not the only problem facing salmon farmers. Recent studies have found contamination with radioactive waste from the Sellafield nuclear plant, while there are concerns about the use of malachite green to kill parasites and infections. There are also health fears over feeding the fish chemicals which colour their flesh pink. Scotland’s estimated 300 salmon farms produce some 160,000 tonnes of salmon a year. Almost three-quarters of the jobs in the industry are in remote rural areas with fragile economies. These are boosted by an estimated €1million a week in wages alone.

  • MC HUGH LAMBASTS FF ON NEW IMPACT REQUEST

    WILD SALMON MINISTER MC HUGH SPEAKS LIKE A TRUE CHAMPION FOR SALMON FARMING

    As our campaign continues in full sail against the ten mega salmon farm plan by Simon Coveney TD Minister for Agriculture and Marine, a Dail committee heard from a Minister whose job it is to oppose such toxic pollution proposals. FISSTA were astounded to hear the new Minister of State for Communications, Energy, Natural Resources and the Gaeltacht Joe McHugh TD speaking with the conviction of a farmed salmon salesman on the merits of salmon farming and the ’20 years of delays in licensing them’ . Mc Hugh was Speaking at the Joint Oireachtas Committee on Agriculture and Gaeltacht, where he chose a script that anyone would be forgiven for believing came from Marine Harvest or BIM. This was one of the first opportunities the new Minister had to outline his vision for wild salmon fisheries and instead he championed the cause of the fish farmers. FISSTA Chairman Paul Lawton stated this evening that “Earlier this month FISSTA highlighted the details as recorded in the minutes of a high level meeting in government buildings last January in which the industry sought their own champion within Government to support Simon Coveney as line minister. It is the measure of such influence when not only does An Taoiseach comply with the request but in the same order we lose our wild salmon champion to the other side. How can this government throw a sustainable angling tourism business of €750m to the fish farming sharks that have left a trail of environmental debris for marine users to clean up.” Asks Paul Lawton.

    Sent from the desk of
    Noel Carr Secretary FISSTA
    Federation of Irish Salmon & Seatrout Anglers.
    Address: Teelin Rd. Carrick. Co. Donegal Office Tel: 00353 749730300
    Mobile. 00353872352001
    Email. Dgl1@indigo.ie

  • Minister Must Save Wild Salmon to prove Allegations are Untrue

    The only way for Minister Joe Mc Hugh to prove otherwise is to be the best Minister for the protection of wild salmon ever.

    Breaking News – this evening Taoiseach denies accusations from FF & SINN FEIN over Salmon farm licensing meetings. “diaspoireacht gineralta a bhi ann” or a general debate says the Taoiseach. Yeah right.

    Taoiseach Enda Kenny caught up in “fishy” row over Galway salmon farm

    Connaught Tribune

    9 October 2014

    By: Dara Bradley

    Taoiseach Enda Kenny is at the centre of a new storm over his “fishy” elevation of a “champion” of fish-farms to a ministerial position with responsibility for fish farming, after lobbying from the largest producer of farmed salmon in Ireland.

    Mr Kenny has been lashed for promoting non-Irish speaking Donegal TD, Joe McHugh, to Junior Minister for Gaeltacht Affairs, given his support of the fish farm industry.

    And, when making the appointment, An Taoiseach lumped in natural resources to Minister McHugh’s new portfolio which also means he has responsibility for Inland Fisheries Ireland, a body that is critical of fish farming and is not enthusiastic about the proposed fish farm in Galway Bay.

    The addition of “natural resources” to the Gaeltacht brief was described as “very odd” at the time of McHugh’s elevation.

    And now the opposition has cried foul over the appointment and make-up of the brief after evidence claimed that Minister McHugh facilitated a meeting between Kenny and Agriculture Minister Simon Coveney and fish farm multi-national Marine Harvest.

    Marine Harvest is in contention to operate the planned fish farm in Galway Bay; it has emerged it lobbied Mr Kenny for the appointment of a “champion of aqualculture” to “co-ordinate the work of” State bodies and agencies in the area of fish farming.

    The meeting, facilitated by McHugh, who accompanied Marine Harvest to meet the Taoiseach, took place in January of this year, and in July, he was subsequently elevated to a junior ministry with responsibility for fish farms.

    Documents released to Galway Bay Against Salmon Cages under Freedom of Information Act (FOI), show that McHugh was present at the meeting between Kenny, Coveney and CEO of Marine Harvest, Alf-Helge Aarskog.

    Minutes of the meeting between Marine Harvest and Deputies Kenny, Coveney and McHugh as well as department officials, show that the multinational company suggested that a champion for aquaculture be appointed to co-ordinate the work of the relevant departments and agencies involved in licensing fish farming.

    http://connachttribune.ie/taoiseach-enda-kenny-caught-fishy-row-galway-salmon-farm-328/

    Government accused of bias over controversial salmon farm plans

    Galway Advertiser, Thu, Oct 09, 2014

    BY KERNAN ANDREWS

    Serious questions about Government impartiality and independence over controversial plans to construct a massive salmon farm off Inis ?irr have been raised following the emergence of minutes from a meeting between the Taoiseach and a fish farm industry giant.

    The minutes relate to a meeting which took place in Government Buildings on January 30 between the Taoiseach, Minister Coveney, and senior personnel from the Taoiseach’s department and the Department of Agriculture, with Marine Harvest CEO Alf-Helge ?arskog and other high ranking members of the company.

    The minutes were released under the Freedom of Information Act to Galway Bay Against Salmon Cages, and show An Taoiseach Enda Kenny and Marine Minister Simon Coveney agreeing with Marine Harvest CEO Alf-Helge ?arskog on progressing “the deep sea aquaculture initiative” in Galway Bay and for both the Taoiseach and the Minister to separatly hold further meetings with Marine Harvest.

    The minutes have sent alarm bells ringing among anglers, environmentalists, some sections of the scientific community, and many TDs and councillors who oppose An Bord Iascaigh Mhara’s contentious proposal to construct a 1,126 acre, 15,000 tonne, open caged salmon fish farm off Inis ?irr.

    Opponents allege that the minutes give the impression of the Government as willing to facilitate Marine Harvest’??????’s requests, and in effect, being an agent for the company and its business interests in the State.

    Independent Connemara councillor Thomas Welby stated this week that it is “incredulous that the Taoiseach and Minister would be openly discussing how they can put systems in place to facilitate one company”.

    Cllr Welby is concerned by the meeting as Marine Harvest is the largest producer of farmed salmon in Ireland and , he alleges, potentially the only company capable of funding and operating the proposed development off the Aran Islands.

    It should be stressed that the minutes do not indicate that Marine Harvest will have any running of the proposed farm or that the Government has made any decision in favour of the proposed structure.

    However, Cllr Welby points to the conclusion of the minutes which outline “measures/steps” agreed between the parties, including that “the deep sea aquaculture initiative would be progressed in respect of Galway Bay”, and that this could only mean the proposed salmon farm.

    For opponents of the proposed farm, the meeting illustrates that the Government may not be impartial on the issue and has largely made up its mind to give the go-ahead, despite the serious scientific and environmental questions which have been raised about the effects of such farms on wild salmon stocks.

    Cllr Welby also feels there is a clear conflict of interest taking place in this meeting, especially for Minister Coveney, who in March 2013, following a question from Fine Gael Galway West TD Seán Kyne, said: “I must separate myself from the project to the extent that I need to make an independent decision.” The Minister has the ultimate responsibility to grant planning for the proposed farm.

    Opponents are also worried by the request, made at the meeting by Marine Harvest, that the industry needs a “champion” to take a developmental role (as distinct from the regulatory role ) to drive forward the interests of the industry and to co-ordinate interactions with the EU Commission and Inland Fisheries Ireland. The company felt there should be “one voice” communicating with the Commission from Ireland in relation to the industry

    http://www.advertiser.ie/galway/article/72823/government-accused-of-bias-over-controversial-salmon-farm-plans

    Sent from the desk of
    Noel Carr Secretary FISSTA
    Federation of Irish Salmon & Seatrout Anglers.
    Address: Teelin Rd. Carrick. Co. Donegal Office Tel: 00353 749730300
    Mobile. 00353872352001
    Email. Dgl1@indigo.ie